A pro-Ripple attorney has provided insights on the possible outcomes of the SEC v. Ripple case. He suggests that settling with the individual defendants could have expedited the case, but even then, it would likely extend into 2026. Another option considered was a complete settlement of all litigation against Ripple and the individual defendants. The attorney emphasizes that the July Summary Judgment was the “law of the land” at the time and criticizes the SEC for presenting shifting and inconsistent legal theories. The SEC’s request for an interlocutory appeal was denied by Judge Analisa Torres, who has previously criticized the SEC’s behavior in the case.

AI Sentiment: Neutral